Nematode genome evolution^*

Most nematodes have genomes ranging from 50–250 Mb (Leroy et al., 2003; Figure 1). Among the nematodes being sequenced, sizes vary from 53 Mb for Haemonchus contortus (Leroy et al., 2003) to 240 Mb for Trichinella spiralis (Hammond and Bianco, 1992). A few nematodes even have genomes as large as those of mammals, such as the ~2100 Mb genome of Parascaris univalens (Niedermaier and Moritz, 2000). Other nematode genomes are tiny, such as the ~30 Mb Bursaphelenchus mucronatus genome (Leroy et al., 2003). The variation in genome size across the phylum is probably even larger, since sizes have only been estimated for approximately 50 species (Leroy et al., 2003; Gregory, 2005, Animal Genome Size Databse).

Nematode genomes are similar in size to those of flatworms, annelids, and insects (~60-100 Mb upwards), but are smaller than those of some invertebrates such as molluscs and echinoderms (~400-500 Mb upwards; Gregory, 2005, Animal Genome Size Database). The compact nature of nematode genomes may due to a high rate of large, spontaneous deletions (Witherspoon and Robertson, 2003), and perhaps to selection for deletions (Denver et al., 2004).

The C. briggsae genome is slightly (~4 Mb) larger than the C. elegans genome, due to a larger amount of repetitive DNA in the C. briggsae genome (Stein et al., 2003). This must be due to proliferation of repeat families in the C. briggsae genome, or loss of repetitive DNA from C. elegans. Comparison of the C. elegans and C. briggsae genomes to those of closely related nematodes will shed light on the relative importance of deletions (which will decrease the genome size), versus insertions and proliferation of repeats (which will both increase the genome size).

Lynch and Conery (2003) suggested that species with smaller effective population sizes (a smaller number of individuals that contribute different alleles to the next generation) have larger genomes, because they tend to accumulate repetitive DNA and genomic duplications. Thus, we expect the genome of C. remanei which is currently being sequenced, to be smaller those of C. elegans and C. briggsae, because its effective population size seems to be larger. That is, in a study of two nuclear genes, the diversity in C. elegans and C. briggsae was just 6-13% of the diversity seen in C. remanei (Graustein et al., 2002). The effective population sizes of parasitic nematodes probably depend on those of their hosts, so parasites of herbivores may have larger effective population sizes than parasites of carnivores or omnivores (Lynch and Conery, 2003). Thus, one could speculate that this explains why the sheep parasite Haemonchus contortus has such a small genome (53 Mb) compared to the human parasite Brugia malayi (85–95 Mb) or the pig parasite Trichinella spiralis (240 Mb).

Since the size difference between the 104 Mb C. briggsae and 100 Mb C. elegans genomes is due to repetitive DNA, they both have ~19,500 genes (Stein et al., 2003). The Brugia malayi genome has a similar size to the Caenorhabditis genomes, ~85-95 Mb, and a similar number of genes, ~18,500 genes (Ghedin et al., 2004; Whitton et al., 2004). The Haemonchus contortus genome is just 53 Mb, but it is not yet clear whether it contains half as many genes as C. elegans, or rather has the same number of genes but half as much non-coding DNA.

Most nematodes have haploid chromosome numbers of n=4–12 (Walton, 1959). The karyotypes of just ~300 species have been studied, but nematodes display a lot of karyotypic variation (Špakulová and Casanova, 2004). The lowest haploid number is n=1 in Parascaris univalens, but very high counts are seen in polyploid species in the Tylenchomorpha. For example, the race of Meloidogyne hapla being sequenced is diploid and has n=14, but another race of M. hapla is polyploid with 2n=45–48 (David Bird, pers. comm.; Triantaphyllou, 1984). Many tylenchomorphs including M. hapla, are parthenogens, in which unfertilized eggs develop into new individuals. Animal species that reproduce in this way seem to be susceptible to polyploidization (Otto and Whitton, 2000). The M. hapla race being sequenced has twice as many chromosomes as most rhabditines, so could reveal traces of an ancient genome duplication in the Tylenchomorpha.

In contrast to the tylenchomorphs, most rhabditines have n=5-6 (Blaxter, 2000). Indeed, C. elegans and C. briggsae both have n=6, even though their chromosomes have undergone ~4000 rearrangements since they diverged (Stein et al., 2003). The lack of fissions or fusions suggests that there could be selection for a stable chromosome number in the Rhabditina.

When Stein et al. (2003) compared the genome of C. elegans to that of C. briggsae, they identified ~4800 conserved segments, with an average size of 37 kb. They estimated that there have been 3.6 interchromosomal rearrangements per Mb in the C. briggsae genome (Stein et al., 2003). Thus, an average C. briggsae chromosome of ~10-20 Mb consists of a mosaic of ~35-70 chunks that match several C. elegans chromosomes. However, some of these segments are very small, so it may be possible to detect ancient Caenorhabditis linkage groups by considering just the largest conserved segments. A genetic map for C. briggsae is currently underway, and should allow us to match each C. briggsae chromosome to the C. elegans chromosome(s) with which it shares common ancestry (Robert Waterston, Raymond Miller, Scott Baird and Asif Chinwalla, unpublished data).

Sequencing of random regions of the Pristionchus pacificus and Brugia malayi genomes suggests that despite the frequent occurrence of reciprocal translocations, ancient secernentean linkage groups may still be detectable. In an 11-gene region sequenced from P. pacificus chromosome III, 10/11 genes had orthologs on C. elegans chromosome III (Lee et al., 2003). This led Lee et al. to suggest that P. pacificus chromosome III and C. elegans chromosome III shared a common ancestor. If this is true, there must have been a lot of intrachromosomal rearrangement since just three pairs of the P. pacificus genes are closely linked in C. elegans, but these pairs are scattered over 12 Mb. Whitton et al. (2004) found evidence suggesting that B. malayi chromosmes can be matched to their C. elegans homologs. They sequenced BAC ends containing 8 Mb of Brugia malayi sequence, and found that 60% of the BACs matched the same C. elegans chromosome at both ends. However, large rearrangements seem to have occurred within chromosomes, because the average distance between two matches was 4 Mb.

Each of Caenorhabditis elegans' chromosomes is divided into a repeat-poor "central cluster" that rarely undergoes meiotic exchange, and two repeat-rich "arms" that have a ~7-fold higher recombination rate (Barnes et al., 1995; C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998). Intriguingly, the arms are evolving far more rapidly than the centers of chromosomes, in terms of both substitutions and chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations, inversions, and duplications (C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998; Stein et al., 2003). This may reflect a lower tolerance to mutation in the central clusters, which contain most of the essential genes and operons (Blumenthal et al., 2002; Kamath et al., 2003). Alternatively, the arms may simply have a higher mutation rate, since the high recombination rate may provoke substitutions (Cutter and Payseur, 2003), while the abundance of repeats probably triggers chromosomal rearrangements (Coghlan and Wolfe, 2002).

Analysis of the Pristionchus pacificus genetic map indicates that at least four of the six chromosomes have genetically-defined central clusters and arms (Ralf Sommer, pers. comm.). Are all nematode chromosomes split into genetically defined central clusters and arms, and do the arms always evolve faster than the centers? Comparison of C. elegans chromosomes to those other nematodes will allow us to address this question; as well as to test the interesting hypothesis of Barnes et al. (1995) that an ancestor of C. elegans had smaller chromosomes consisting of just "clusters", which later sprouted arms due to proliferation of repetitive DNA.

Barnes et al. (1995) noticed that the recombination rate in most C. elegans autosomes differs by a factor of ~7–12 between the arms and central clusters. However, in chromosome V, the recombination rate differs by a factor of just four between the arms and cluster. The relatively higher recombination rate in the central cluster of chromosome V may be a cause (or possibly a result) of its "arm-like" characteristics: its high density of gene families (C. elegans Sequencing Consortium, 1998), low number of essential genes (Kamath et al., 2003), scarcity of operons (Blumenthal et al., 2002), abundant species-specific genes (Parkinson et al., 2004), and low probability of sequence matches to Brugia malayi BAC end sequences (Whitton et al., 2004).

There are ~1000 operons in the C. elegans genome, of which 96% are conserved in C. briggsae, far more than expected if selection selection did not act to preserve operons (60%; Stein et al., 2003). Gene order in ~15% of the genome is stabilized by selection against rearrangements of operons, since 15% of C. elegans genes are part of operons (Blumenthal et al., 2002). In fact, operons are concentrated in the central clusters of C. elegans chromosomes, so probably contribute to the lower rearrangement rate in the centers compared to the arms (Blumenthal et al., 2002). One C. elegans operon is conserved in the closely related rhabditine Oscheius (Evans et al., 1997), but at least one C. elegans operon has been broken in Pristionchus pacificus (Lee and Sommer, 2003). Operons probably exist in the Rhabditina, Tylenchina, and Spirurina, since trans-splicing has been observed in Haemonchus contortus, Panagrellus redivivus, Ascaris suum, Anisakis spp. and Brugia malayi (Bektesh et al., 1988; Takacs et al., 1988). Two unresolved questions are whether Trichinella spiralis has trans-splicing and operons, and whether nematode operons are related to those in flatworms (Davis and Hodgson, 1997).

C. elegans chromosomes also contain small clusters of ~2-5 genes that are co-expressed in muscle, even though they do not belong to operons; as well as clusters co-expressed in the germline, intestine, and neurons (Roy et al., 2002, Table 1: intestine=Mountain 08 and neurons=Mountain 06). Furthermore, C. elegans genes seem to be partitioned between chromosomes according to their general role: essential genes are mostly found in the centers of chromosomes I, II and III; while genes involved in worm behavior and morphology are concentrated on chromosomes II and X (Kamath et al., 2003). This organization may permit co-regulation of genes that sit inside the same chromatin domain (Kamath et al., 2003). There may have been selection against rearrangement of one large cluster of C. elegans genes on chromosome II that are expressed during spermatogenesis, since it is part of the largest conserved segment between the C. elegans and C. briggsae (Miller et al., 2004). In contrast, two other spermatogenesis clusters on C. elegans chromosome IV are not found in C. briggsae (Miller et al., 2004). An intriguing possibility is that these two clusters were assembled just in C. elegans, by rearrangements that were adaptive because they permitted co-regulation of reproductive genes (Miller et al., 2004).

HOX genes are transcription factors that are closely clustered in the genomes of most animals (Bürglin, 1994). They control the expression of anterior-posterior patterning along the body axis during early embryogenesis collinearly with their arrangement on the chromosome. The HOX cluster has been conserved in most animal phyla over hundreds of millions of years of evolution (Ferrier and Holland, 2001), but the nematode HOX cluster is surprisingly poorly preserved. The ancestral bilaterian probably had a cluster of nine HOX genes (nine ortholog groups), but all nematodes have lost at least three ortholog groups (Aboobaker and Blaxter, 2003). A further two ortholog groups were lost in the lineage leading to C. elegans, after the Spirurina-Rhabditina-Tylenchina clade diverged from other nematodes. Aboobaker and Blaxter (2003) point out that these two HOX ortholog groups were lost around the time when C. elegans' ancestor switched from a regulative mode of development to a deterministic lineage-driven mode. They suggest that perhaps the transition freed the two HOX ortholog groups from their role in anterior-posterior patterning, making their loss tolerable. Interestingly, the HOX cluster has been broken up in C. elegans: its six HOX genes (belonging to four ortholog groups) are arranged in three pairs scattered over 5 Mb of chromosome III. Trichinella spiralis probably has a regulative mode of development, but it is not yet known whether its HOX genes are clustered. However, even though Brugia malayi has lineage-driven development, most of its HOX cluster seems to have been preserved intact (Aboobaker and Blaxter, 2003).

In Caenorhabditis elegans, sex determination acts through an X-chromosome dosage mechanism: animals with two X chromosomes develop as hermaphrodites, whereas XO animals develop as males (Nicoll et al., 1997). XX/XO sex determination is very common across the Nematoda (Walton, 1940), suggesting that the first nematode possibly had XX/XO sex determination. Even if the C. elegans and Trichinella spiralis XX/XO systems did share common ancestry, the traces will be hard to find, since sex determination pathways and genes are evolving very quickly both in terms of sequence change and gene regulation (reviewed in Haag and Doty, 2005). However, at least one key gene is conserved in the XX/XO sex determination pathways of C. elegans and Pristionchus pacificus (Pires-daSilva and Sommer, 2004), so it should be possible to determine whether the P. pacificus, C. elegans and Haemonchus contortus XX/XO systems are orthologous.

Only a handful of nematodes have Y chromosomes: Brugia malayi (Underwood and Bianco, 1999), Onchocerca volvulus (Hirai et al., 1987), Baylisascaris transfuga (Mutafova, 1995), Contracaecum incurvum (White, 1973), and Trichuris muris (Špakulová et al., 1994). Since Ys are only known in these few distantly related nematodes, White (1973) suggested that they probably emerged recently. In papaya the sequence of the Y chromosome betrays its recent origin from autosomes (Liu et al., 2004), and it will be interesting to see if the Brugia malayi Y arose in a similar way.

The involvement of the C. elegans X chromosome in sex determination may have restrained its pace of structural evolution. Since C. elegans diverged from C. briggsae, its X chromosome has undergone about half as many rearrangements as its autosomes (Stein et al., 2003). Indeed, two of the three largest conserved segments between the two genomes are on C. elegans X (Stein et al., 2003). Furthermore, a genetic linkage map of Pristionchus pacificus suggests that the X chromosome may have been preserved largely intact since the divergence of P. pacificus from C. elegans (Lee et al., 2003; Ralf Sommer, pers. comm.). Thus, although the genes involved in sex determination tolerate high substitution rates, structural rearrangements of the sex chromosome may be more detrimental to the mechanism of sex determination. A possible reason for a lower rate of rearrangement of the X chromosome compared to autosomes is selection against translocations of the regions of the X chromosome from which dosage compensation is initiated (Csankovszki et al., 2004), and/or of regions that contain the "X-signal elements" whose dosage determines the sex of an embryo (Meyer, 2000). X-autosomal translocations may also be deleterious because they upset the dosage of the translocated genes (Ohno, 1967).

In nematode species in which the Y chromosome determines sex, the rate of chromosomal rearrangement in X may be similar to that in autosomes, or perhaps even higher. In Brugia malayi, which has a Y chromosome, the X chromosome seems to have undergone more interchromosomal rearrangements than the autosomes. That is, among B. malayi BACs that match the C. elegans X chromosome at one end, an unusually high number match an autosome at the other end (Whitton et al., 2004). Perhaps the emergence of a Y chromosome in B. malayi has liberated its X from any function in sex determination, resulting in relaxation of selection against rearrangements of X.

The most common reproductive strategy among nematodes is sexual reproduction between males and females (amphimixis), which is seen in Caenorhabditis remanei, Caenorhabditis sp. PB2801, Caenorhabditis japonica, Haemonchus contortus, Brugia malayi, and Trichinella spiralis. However, alternative reproductive strategies have arisen in some nematode groups, including hermaphroditism, parthenogenesis, and haplo-diploidy. For example, C. elegans, C. briggsae and Pristionchus pacificus are hermaphroditic (see The evolution of nematode sex determination), while the strain of Meloidogyne hapla being sequenced is a facultative meiotic parthenogen (David Bird, pers. comm.). Because hermaphroditic species (and perhaps parthenogenetic species: Archetti, 2004) have a smaller effective population size than amphimictic species, they will tend to accumulate deleterious mutations, resulting in a faster substitution rate and rate of chromosomal rearrangement (Charlesworth, 1992; Cutter and Payseur, 2003). This may explain why substitution rates in C. elegans and Meloidogyne seem to be high compared to most nematodes (Blaxter et al., 1998). We will soon be able to test whether they also have an accelerated rate of chromosomal rearrangement.

Since C. elegans and C. briggsae diverged, their chromosomes have been splintered by ~250 reciprocal translocations, ~1400 inversions and ~2700 transpositions (Stein et al., 2003). Intrachromosomal rearrangement is about four times more frequent than interchromosomal rearrangement. Even so, translocations are surprisingly common in Caenorhabditis compared to flies, in which translocations are extremely rare (Ranz et al., 2001; Sharakhov et al., 2002). This may be because almost all dipterans have "monocentric" chromosomes, in which the kinetochores assemble on a localized region in each chromosome. In contrast, "holocentric" species such as C. elegans and C. briggsae have diffuse kinetochores that form along the length of their chromosomes during mitosis. Since the kinetochores are the primary chromosomal attachment site for spindle microtubules, they play a key role in ensuring high fidelity chromosome transmission in both monocentric and holocentric species. However, little is known of the relationship between the distribution of kinetic activity along chromosomes and the pattern of chromosomal rearrangement. In species with monocentric chromosomes, many translocations will be lethal because they will give rise to acentric or dicentric chromosomes; while species with holocentric chromosomes may be more tolerant of translocations (Dernburg, 2001). Most nematodes have holocentric chromosomes, but Trichinella spiralis and some other trichinellids have monocentric chromosomes (Mutafova et al., 1982; Špakulová et al., 1994). Thus, comparison of the T. spiralis genome to that of C. elegans may provide clues as to whether holocentric chromosomes are more susceptible to rearrangement, and whether the first nematode had holocentric chromosomes.

Parkinson et al. (2004) sequenced ESTs from 30 different nematode species across the phylum, and defined ~94,000 genes from ~60,000 families. Surprisingly, only about 15,000 (15%) of the ~94,000 genes are found in all four clades of nematodes studied (Rhabditina, Tylenchina, Spirurina, Dorylaimia). These 15,000 genes are probably involved in core metabolic or structural pathways, since most of them (91%) have sequence matches outside the Nematoda. In addition, they identified ~1300 genes that are nematode-specific but that are found in most nematodes. These ~1300 genes probably have roles that are important for nematode body plan and life history, and so may shed light on the early evolution of the phylum.

Since C. elegans has diverged from C. briggsae, chemoreceptors have proliferated in the C. elegans genome, so that it now has almost twice as many as C. briggsae (718 versus 429; Stein et al., 2003). Duplication and divergence of extra chemoreceptors may have allowed C. elegans to adopt a slightly different ecological niche than C. briggsae, since it uses chemoreceptors to find food, and to avoid predators, pathogens and toxins (Troemel, 1999). On the other hand, C. elegans seems to have lost several genes (~30 genes) that are found in both Pristionchus pacificus and Haemonchus contortus (Parkinson et al., 2004). For example, C. elegans has lost a DNA methyltransferase gene that is found in P. pacificus — a loss that probably led to the abolition of DNA methylation in C. elegans (Gutierrez and Sommer, 2004). Contrasting the gene families that have been duplicated or lost in each of the ten nematode genomes may reveal selection for different gene contents in different species.

C. elegans has ~1000 genes that are not found in C. briggsae, and that lack any match in sequence databases (Stein et al., 2003). Of these, ~200 have been confirmed by EST or cDNA data, so are definitely not gene prediction errors. These genes may have diverged so rapidly that their C. briggsae homolog is unrecognizable; or may have been assembled de novo via chromosomal rearrangements in the C. elegans genome (Long, 2001). Duplications, chromosomal rearrangements and transposable elements are known to play a role in the birth of novel genes (Betran and Long, 2002; Ganko et al., 2003; Long, 2001). Thus, the abundance of species-specific genes in the arms of C. elegans chromosomes probably results from the arms' high rate of rearrangement (Stein et al., 2003).

C. elegans is not alone in having so many species-specific genes. In a survey of ESTs from 30 nematode species, as many as 30-50% of genes in each species seemed to be species-specific (Parkinson et al., 2004). Among the nematodes whose genomes are being sequenced, the fraction ranged from 19% for Haemonchus contortus to 37% for Trichinella spiralis. This is far higher than the fraction of C. elegans genes that are species-specific (5%). However, some of the putative species-specific T. spiralis genes may not be truly species-specific, but rather are just very divergent; if so, we might be able to identify their C. elegans orthologs by using synteny information. Furthermore, some T. spiralis EST consensus sequences were probably too short to find sequences matches; we may be able to detect C. elegans orthologs of these T. spiralis genes once we know their full-length sequences.

Nematode genespace is probably far larger than 60,000 gene families. Firstly, Parkinson et al.'s survey probably missed many genes expressed at low levels and genes whose expression is restricted to a small number of specialized cells, which are difficult to detect in an EST survey. Secondly, they only sampled 30 species out of at least 25,000 species. Furthermore, all of the species sampled so far are terrestrial, and do not yet include any of the large number of poorly sampled enoplid and chromadorid marine nematodes (Lambshead, 1993). Since the first nematode was probably a marine animal (Poinar, 1983), perhaps an enoplid (Blaxter, 2003), even more diversity in gene content may be found in the oceans.

Horizontal gene transfer occurs frequently in prokaryotes, but seems to be rare in eukaryotes. For example, ~1% of the gene repertoire in the nematode Meloidogyne probably originated by horizontal transfer (Scholl et al., 2003), compared to 1-5% of single-copy genes and at least 22% of gene duplicates in Y-Proteobacteria (Lerat et al., 2005) Meloidogyne hapla, a plant parasitic nematode, seems to have gained at least a dozen genes by horizontal gene transfer from bacteria that occupy similar niches in the soil and roots (Scholl et al., 2003). Those genes gained are useful for the nematode's parasitic lifestyle, such as cellulases for digesting plant material, and signaling molecules that induce morphological changes in the plant, facilitating invasion (McCarter et al., 2003; Weerasinghe et al., 2005). A distantly related plant parasite, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, seems to have independently acquired a cellulase gene from a fungus (Kikuchi et al., 2004). Perhaps horizontal transfer can spur the transition to parasitism (Weerasinghe et al., 2005)?

Several groups of parasitic nematodes, including Brugia malayi, live in symbiosis with specific bacteria carried by the nematodes (see Table 1 in Blaxter, 2003). Some of these are extracellular symbionts, but others are intracellular, such as Wolbachia living in B. malayi and other filarial nematodes. The capture of the Wolbachia gene set seems to have been adaptive for filarial nematodes, since killing Wolbachia with antibiotics reduces the growth and fecundity of the nematodes (Foster et al., 2005; Hoerauf et al., 2001).

Free-living nematodes may also have pinched genes from organisms that live nearby Many nematodes use other animals, often arthropods and molluscs, as transport hosts. For example, C. remanei lives in close association with molluscs and isopods (Baird, 1999). Indeed, C. elegans has four genes, including an alcohol dehydrogenase, that have stronger sequence matches to fungi than to other animals (Parkinson and Blaxter, 2003). These C. elegans genes group with fungal genes in phylogenetic trees. Similar phylogenetic analyses will allow us to scan the eight new genomes for stolen genes.

Parasitism of plants and animals has evolved independently at least nine times in the history of the nematodes (Dorris et al., 1999). Four of the nematodes whose genomes are being sequenced are parasites: Haemonchus contortus, Meloidogyne hapla, Brugia malayi and Trichinella spiralis. The adoption of parasitism in nematodes probably required adaptation of genes present in their free-living ancestors (Blaxter, 2003). For example, modification of nutrient-acquisition genes found in C. elegans, such as digestive enzymes or secreted hydrolases, are likely to have been important for the evolution of parasitism (Geary and Thompson, 2001). The ability of parasitic nematodes to survive immunological attack, some living in an infected individual for years, has long been a puzzle. The cuticle is the main site of interaction between a nematode and its environment, and many nematode genes so far implicated in evading host defenses are secreted or cuticle proteins (Davis et al., 2004; Maizels et al., 2001). For example, the main soluble surface glycoprotein of filarial nematodes, a secreted glutathione peroxidase (GPX-1), is hypothesized to have a role in immune evasion (Zvelebil et al., 1993). In viral, bacterial and protozoan parasites, genes involved in host immune evasion or recognition are often under positive selection, and so show patterns of rapid amino acid substitution (McInerney et al., 2003). Indeed, B. malayi GPX-1 shows signs of positive selection (Zvelebil et al., 1993). By scanning for Haemonchus contortus genes that have diverged sharply in sequence from their Pristionchus and Caenorhabditis orthologs, and that bear secretory signals (Harcus et al., 2004), it may be possible to identify H. contortus genes that have adapted for a parasitic lifestyle.

Some genes essential for parasitism in worms may be novel genes. One possible source is gene duplication, which allows one duplicate to keep the original role, and the other duplicate to take on a parasitic role. For example, the alt gene family of filarial nematodes, which has been implicated in establishing infection, has a single C. elegans ortholog (Gomez-Escobar et al., 2002). On the other hand, other novel genes adapted for parasitism may have been assembled de novo, or have been gained by horizontal gene transfer: plant parasitic nematodes seem to have acquired "parasitism genes" from bacteria in their environment (Bird et al., 2003).

Some "parasitism genes" may by identifiable by examining the expression pattern of their C. elegans orthologs. In Haemonchus contortus and Brugia malayi, the infective stage of the life cycle is the third larval (L3) developmental stage (Blaxter, 2003). In C. elegans the L3 developmental stage is an alternative developmental pathway adopted when food is scarce, called the dauer larva. Thus, identifying the orthologs of C. elegans genes expressed in the dauer larva (Wang and Kim, 2003) may be a route to pinpointing Brugia and Haemonchus genes involved in infection (Bürglin et al., 1998).